Comments on: SBR12: Trident (again), and Labour’s relationship with bloggers http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/ The best of Scottish blogging every week Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:34:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Top bloggers’ names dragged through the mud for no good reason « doctorvee http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-505 Top bloggers’ names dragged through the mud for no good reason « doctorvee Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:33:03 +0000 http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/#comment-505 [...] wasn’t my final encounter with him though. He went back to Scottish Roundup, calling me “janus faced C - - -”. One can only guess what his four-letter C-word was supposed to [...] [...] wasn’t my final encounter with him though. He went back to Scottish Roundup, calling me “janus faced C – - -”. One can only guess what his four-letter C-word was supposed to [...]

]]> By: Will P http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-40 Will P Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:03:43 +0000 http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/#comment-40 I'm going to follow Duncan's example and not get the SBR dragged into this... Though I would advise Councillor Kelly to read my response: http://macnumpty.blogspot.com/2007/01/readers-views.html I’m going to follow Duncan’s example and not get the SBR dragged into this…

Though I would advise Councillor Kelly to read my response: http://macnumpty.blogspot.com/2007/01/readers-views.html

]]> By: Terry Kelly http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Terry Kelly Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:59:30 +0000 http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/#comment-39 I've just found this site, I read with interest that the author thought that it was a no no to refuse to print readers comments even abusive ones, he accused me of this. I then got to the bit where the author says he doesn' much care for me or what I write and that consequently I am to be excluded from his site. I'm going back to read it again just in case I got it wrong, no I got it right, wow, beam me up ! janus faced C - - - but at least it's Scottish c - - - is it worth arguing with people like this? I’ve just found this site, I read with interest that the author thought that it was a no no to refuse to print readers comments even abusive ones, he accused me of this. I then got to the bit where the author says he doesn’ much care for me or what I write and that consequently I am to be excluded from his site. I’m going back to read it again just in case I got it wrong, no I got it right, wow, beam me up ! janus faced C – - – but at least it’s Scottish c – - – is it worth arguing with people like this?

]]> By: doctorvee » Setting the record straight http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-38 doctorvee » Setting the record straight Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:56:15 +0000 http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2006/12/24/sbr12-trident-again-and-labours-relationship-with-bloggers/#comment-38 [...] I have found, via Will P, that Councillor Terry Kelly has responded to the latest post I wrote at Scottish Blogging Roundup. He claims that he tried to leave a comment but couldn’t work out how to. (It’s dead easy by the way, just follow the ‘Comments’ link and type your comment and hit ‘Submit Comment’.) Anyway, he says he hopes for me to “put the record straight” so here we go. I’ll quote his post in full. The above is a site which comments on other blogs, they seemed in the past to be harmless enough, if a bit pedestrian. Unfortunately I’m writing this on my blog because I’m on my own and have no computer expertise/back up and I couldn’t figure out how to reply to what they have been saying about me. I sometimes check who has visited my site and see what they have been commenting on, mostly it’s predictable right wing/nationalist drivel with a few exceptions, some of the exceptions are in fact right wing, but as yet no nationalists. Anyway I have no problem with that, there is however a pattern emerging which shows a hint of collusion which emerges when several of them accuse me of stifling debate and cutting out comments. I have tried to explain before that I will try to print comments if they are not abusive, in the past couple of weeks I have only removed three of these and printed everything else, no matter how puerile. This site seems to have joined in with these liars and is now, as far as I’m concerned not to be trusted, how easy is it to accuse me of this? they have nationalist stamped all over them, perhaps the site will put the record straight but I won’t hold my breath. I intend to print everything that’s printable. Why wouldn’t I when so much much of it makes my case for me. [...] [...] I have found, via Will P, that Councillor Terry Kelly has responded to the latest post I wrote at Scottish Blogging Roundup. He claims that he tried to leave a comment but couldn’t work out how to. (It’s dead easy by the way, just follow the ‘Comments’ link and type your comment and hit ‘Submit Comment’.) Anyway, he says he hopes for me to “put the record straight” so here we go. I’ll quote his post in full. The above is a site which comments on other blogs, they seemed in the past to be harmless enough, if a bit pedestrian. Unfortunately I’m writing this on my blog because I’m on my own and have no computer expertise/back up and I couldn’t figure out how to reply to what they have been saying about me. I sometimes check who has visited my site and see what they have been commenting on, mostly it’s predictable right wing/nationalist drivel with a few exceptions, some of the exceptions are in fact right wing, but as yet no nationalists. Anyway I have no problem with that, there is however a pattern emerging which shows a hint of collusion which emerges when several of them accuse me of stifling debate and cutting out comments. I have tried to explain before that I will try to print comments if they are not abusive, in the past couple of weeks I have only removed three of these and printed everything else, no matter how puerile. This site seems to have joined in with these liars and is now, as far as I’m concerned not to be trusted, how easy is it to accuse me of this? they have nationalist stamped all over them, perhaps the site will put the record straight but I won’t hold my breath. I intend to print everything that’s printable. Why wouldn’t I when so much much of it makes my case for me. [...]

]]>